top of page
Screenshot 2025-12-29 at 12.55.28 AM.png
MTN-States-Policy-Logo-2023_Color-Horz_edited.png

A comprehensive tool for parents and the community

School district budgets are a maze of numbers and jargon that most citizens cannot easily understand. Even lawmakers and some school officials have difficulty concluding if a district is spending money properly, has the resources it needs to be successful, or is making a difference in the educational outcomes of children.

 

For example, Idaho’s largest school district, the has a budget that is hundreds of pages long and includes six different funds and 36 different programs. The budget is readily available for citizen review, but transparency doesn't mean much if it is not understandable.

This is why Mountain States Policy Center recommends lawmakers adopt a Public School Transparency Act. This simple step would help taxpayers and parents determine whether their local district has enough funds and whether it is properly spending the cash in the classroom.

 

As part of this idea, all public school districts would be required, both on the first page of their budget and also on the front page of the district’s main website, to report six simple things:

 

1. Amount of total dollars (all funds – local, state and federal) spent by the district that year

2. Amount of total dollars spent per student, per year

3. Amount & percentage of total dollars allocated to average classroom

4. Average administrator salary & benefits

5. Average teacher salary & benefits

6. Ratio of administrators to teachers to students

Some schools may go further, reporting student outcomes, teacher retention rates and more.

Very little extra work would be needed to provide this data and make it accessable on paper and online. Most districts already have it somewhere in their budget documents. They know where to look, whereas parents and taxpayers can get lost. In the interest of transparency, school districts should be eager and willing to share this information with the public in a clear, concise manner.

 

Parents and taxpayers may see this data and conclude their school districts need more resources. Others may see it and believe that not enough is being done to spend money in the classroom. Regardless, the community will have a broader sense of the results being achieved, and what – if any – changes need to be made.

 

As we wait for legislative action, Mountain States Policy Center presents this first edition of the Public School Transparency Index for school districts in Idaho. The data contained in this report comes directly from state and district resources, reports and budgets. The data includes:

 

  • Graduation rates

  • Teacher retention rates

  • Chronic absenteeism rates

  • Idaho Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) data

  • Top and bottom performing schools in each district

  • Total financial resources in district

  • Financial resources available per student

  • Average teacher salaries

  • Superintendent salaries

  • Percentage of district employees who are teachers

  • Teacher to student ratios

Full reports from Montana, Wyoming and Washington will come in subsequent years.

KEY FINDINGS

 

1. When including all funds, only seven Idaho school districts have resources of less than $10,000 per student, per year

2. Teachers make up at least 50% of the total district staffing in just one-third of Idaho school districts

3.  At least 17 Idaho superintendents receive a yearly salary higher than the Governor of the state ($151,400)

4. The average teacher salary exceeds $60,000 per year in just 15 districts statewide

5. There is no correlation between higher district spending and student outcomes in the district

 

SCHOOL DISTRICT
# OF STUDENTS
TOTAL FINANCIAL RESOURCES
RESOURCES PER STUDENT
% OF FTE's WHO ARE TEACHERS
STUDENT TO TEACHER RATIO
CURRENT FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY
Aberdeen School District
650
$9,613,535
$14,790
43%
13:1
American Falls School District
1,534
$15,872,142
$10,346
38%
14:1
Basin School District
348
$4,599,656
$13,217
42%
14:1
Bear Lake School District
1,439
$15,566,882
$10,917
41%
19:1
Blackfoot School District
3,865
$45,598,239
$11,797
47%
17:1
Blaine County School District
3,234
$73,982,409
$22,876
54%
11:1
Bliss Joint District
124
$2,563,861
$20,676
55%
8:1
Boise Independent District
22,496
$444,155,647
$19.743
48%
15:1
Bonneville Joint District
13,663
$152,779,366
$11,181
44%
19:1
Boundary County District
1,375
$18,439,128
$13,410
42%
16:1
Bruneau-Grand View Joint District
270
$5,097,983
$18,881
41%
11:1
Buhl Joint District
1,224
$8,813,323
$7,200
51%
17:1
Butte County Joint District
399
$9,201,509
$23,061
46%
12:1
Caldwell School District
5,401
$68,224,157
$12,631
52%
16:1
Camas County District
168
$3,603,782
$21,451
50%
5:1
Cambridge Joint District
147
$2,189,450
$14,894
58%
8:1
Cascade School District
206
NA
NA
49%
8:1
Cassia County Joint District
5,541
$60,830,195
$10,978
50%
17:1
Castleford Joint District
302
$2,095,971
$6,940
51%
13:1
Challis Joint District
345
$5,411,137
$15,684
47%
11:1
Clark County District
108
$2,589,904
$23,980
55%
6:1
Coeur d'Alene School District
9,677
$117,792,262
$12,172
44%
17:1
Cottonwood Joint District
435
$5,614,946
$12,907
41%
14:1
Council District
294
$3,123,147
$10,622
43%
15:1
Culdesac Joint District
125
$2,613,562
$20,908
47%
9:1
Emmett Independent District
2,581
$28,772,221
$11,147
44%
18:1
Filer School District
1,547
$18,322,898
$11,844
50%
17:1
Firth School District
838
$13,024,197
$15,542
47%
16:1
Fremont County Joint District
2,245
$31,459,973
$14,013
43%
17:1
Fruitland School District
1,584
$18,912,428
$11,939
41%
18:1
Garden Valley School District
264
$4,453,857
$16,870
51%
11:1
Genesee Joint District
295
$4,596,183
$15,580
42%
13:1
Glenns Ferry Joint District
363
$9,115,711
$25,112
40%
13:1
Gooding Joint District
1,195
$30,782,267
$25,759
48%
16:1
Grace Joint District
519
$5,706,694
$10,995
46%
14:1
Hagerman Joint District
396
$5,111,170
$12,906
49%
15:1
Hansen School District
315
$4,501,485
$14,290
55%
11:1
Highland Joint District
172
$3,551,274
$20,646
47%
11:1
Homedale Joint District
1,271
$14,594,406
$11,482
47%
16:1
Horseshoe Bend District
218
$4,466,312
$20,487
38%
11:1
Idaho Falls School District
10,289
$157,448,665
$15,302
41%
18:1
Jefferson County Joint District
6,750
$107,768,114
$15,965
45%
19:1
Jerome Joint District
4,082
NA
NA
47%
17:1
Kamiah Joint District
387
NA
NA
36%
12:1
Kellogg Joint District
1,151
$15,922,927
$13,833
38%
16:1
Kendrick Joint Distrcit
287
$4,706,765
$16,399
NA
NA
Kimberly School District
2,020
$34,946,329
$17,300
45%
17:1
Kootenai School District
214
$5,123,615
$23,942
37%
12:1
Kuna Joint District
5,800
$53,517,911
$9,227
46%
18:1
Lake Pend Oreille School District
3,734
$90,437,088
$24,219
46%
16:1
Lakeland Joint School District
4,602
$66,475,367
$14,444
46%
17:1
Lapwai School District
516
$15,837,085
$30,692
46%
14:1
Lewiston Independent District
4,582
$87,431,834
$19,081
46%
15:1
Mackay Joint District
213
$3,044,498
$14,293
51%
12:1
Madison School District
5,791
$50,952,958
$8,798
37%
20:1
Marsh Valley Joint District
1,205
$12,152,001
$10,084
51%
16:1
Marsing Joint District
814
$12,964,394
$15,926
44%
14:1
Page 1 of 2
VIEW THE FULL INDEX >>

RESEARCH NOTE

 

The information contained in this study represents the latest available data obtained by Mountain States Policy Center via official sources – the state of Idaho’s Department of Education, publicly available state data, and school district budgets. A school district’s total resources may include local, state and federal funding, as well as balances transferred from previous years and various other funds not necessarily meant for daily instruction.

​​

Unfortunately, the layout of school district budgets in Idaho are not standardized. In fact, MSPC researchers found at least five different budget formats – making it more difficult to accurately contrast each district’s resources – thus, the reason for an index and a uniform reporting method.

 

Education data is updated frequently. Therefore, the information contained in this report represents only a snapshot in time and is subject to periodic change. Data containing an asterisk is considered incomplete. A school district’s current financial transparency is based on the availability, ease and depth of clearly-marked budget postings online.

​​

Public charter schools are not included in this report. Nothing contained in this study shall be construed as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any legislation.

VIEW THE FULL INDEX >>
bottom of page