This is how much a 30-day gas tax holiday could save families
- Chris Cargill
- 6 hours ago
- 3 min read
Every time gas prices spike, the same ritual begins.
Politicians point fingers. Some blame oil companies. Others blame environmental policies. Cable news fills with charts, outrage, and very little relief for the people actually standing at the pump.
Meanwhile, families just keep paying.
For most Americans, gasoline isn’t optional. It’s how you get to work, take your kids to school, buy groceries, and live your life—especially in states like Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, where long distances and limited transit options make driving essential. When prices surge, it’s not an abstract policy debate. It’s a direct hit to household budgets.
That’s why a simple question deserves serious attention:Should policymakers temporarily suspend state gas taxes when prices spike?
Not forever. Not as a grand solution to energy policy. Just for 30 days.
Because while politicians argue about long-term fixes, families are dealing with short-term pain.
Let’s take a step back from rhetoric and look at the numbers.
State gas taxes add a meaningful amount to the price at the pump. In Idaho and Montana, it’s about 33 cents per gallon. In Wyoming, about 24 cents. In Washington, it’s far higher—over 55 cents per gallon, and effectively more than $1 per gallon when you factor in carbon pricing.
That adds up quickly.
Based on actual gasoline consumption:
In Washington, drivers would collectively save about $120 million in one month from suspending the gas tax alone—and roughly $240 million if broader policy-driven costs were included.
In Idaho, the savings would be about $23 million.
In Montana, about $16 million.
In Wyoming, about $7–8 million.
Those are big numbers. But what matters most is what it means for families.
State | 2024 Gallons | Avg. Gallons/Month | Cost per gallon | 30-Day Savings |
Idaho | 829,592,371 | 69,132,698 | $0.33 | $22,800,000 |
Montana | 577,514,213 | 48,126,184 | $0.33 | $15,900,000 |
Washington (gas tax) | 2,654,618,522 | 221,218,210 | $0.55 | $122,600,000 |
Washington (carbon tax) | 2,654,618,522 | 221,218,210 | $0.50-$1.14 | Up to $246,400,000 |
Wyoming | 373,008,842 | 31,084,070 | $0.24 | $7,500,000 |
The typical household uses roughly 90–120 gallons of gasoline per month, depending on commute and location.
A 30-day gas tax holiday would mean:
Idaho / Montana: about $30–$40 in savings per month
Wyoming: about $20–$30 per month
Washington: about $50–$70 per month from the gas tax alone—and potentially $100+ if broader price impacts are included

That’s not life-changing money.
But it’s not trivial either.
It’s a tank of gas. A week of groceries. A utility bill. For families already stretched thin, it’s breathing room.
Critics of gas tax holidays raise legitimate concerns.
True gas taxes fund roads and infrastructure (Washington's carbon tax is a different story). Suspending them—even temporarily—means less revenue for maintenance and construction. There’s also the question of whether the full savings would reach consumers, or if some would be absorbed elsewhere in the supply chain.
Those are fair points.
But they miss a key reality: timing matters.
A permanent repeal is one thing. A targeted, temporary suspension during a price spike is another. States routinely adjust tax policy in response to economic conditions—this would simply apply that logic to energy costs.
And in many cases, states have budget surpluses or rainy-day funds precisely for moments like this.
What’s striking is how often leaders prefer symbolic fights over practical relief.
Blaming oil companies may be politically satisfying. So is attacking environmental policies. But neither lowers prices tomorrow. Neither helps a parent filling up their car tonight.
A 30-day gas tax holiday wouldn’t solve the global energy market. It wouldn’t eliminate price volatility. It wouldn’t end the debate over long-term policy.
But it would do something Washington often struggles to do: Deliver immediate, visible relief to the people paying the bills.
In a polarized environment, even small policy ideas can become ideological battlegrounds.
They shouldn’t.
A temporary gas tax suspension is not a radical proposal. It’s a pragmatic one. It acknowledges that while we argue about the future of energy, people still have to live in the present.
And right now, that present is expensive.
The question isn’t whether a gas tax holiday fixes everything. It’s whether, for 30 days, policymakers are willing to prioritize helping families over scoring political points.
Because at the pump, rhetoric doesn’t matter. Only the price does.


